Skip to main content
· 11/1/2023

Daniel Skipper II v. Mountain State Beverage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Precedent dictates, and the parties agree, that courts apply ‘intermediate scrutiny’ to statutes that classify on the basis of gender.
  • “A state need not conclusively prove the existence of past or present racial discrimination to establish a strong basis in evidence for concluding that remedial action is necessary.”
  • “A state need not conclusively prove the existence of past or pre- sent racial discrimination to establish a strong basis in evi- dence for concluding that remedial action is necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.