· 7/11/1991
Daniel RUGGIERI, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. WARNER & SWASEY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee
Citations
- 938 F.2d 322
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14687
- 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,868
- 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 700
- 1991 WL 124450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, but not adopting, Chrysler formulation and remanding to the district court to determine whether to grant motion to amend
- “The term ‘disposition’ connotes ‘finality[.]’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Cyr, Bownes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.