Skip to main content
· 7/11/1991

Daniel RUGGIERI, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. WARNER & SWASEY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee

Citations

  • 938 F.2d 322
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14687
  • 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,868
  • 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 700
  • 1991 WL 124450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, but not adopting, Chrysler formulation and remanding to the district court to determine whether to grant motion to amend
  • “The term ‘disposition’ connotes ‘finality[.]’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Cyr, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.