Skip to main content
· 3/27/1973

Daniel Ross v. Dr. Stanley Blackledge

Citations

  • 477 F.2d 616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for evidentiary hearing on whether “there is adequate nourishment in the pork-free foods currently available to [Muslim] prisoners”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sobeloff, Winter, Craven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.