Ninth Circuit· 5/25/2016
Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul Copenhaver
Citations
- 823 F.3d 1238
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9559
- 2016 D.A.R. 4956
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “I was not able to launch a proper defense... .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Silverman, Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 1,932×
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 1,427×
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 1,119×
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 732×
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsThird Circuit· 2005-12-15· cited 521×
- Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2012-03-28· cited 464×
- Reeb v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 2011-03-03· cited 224×
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Jerry J. Enomoto, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2005-03-09· cited 149×
- Reynolds v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 2010-05-07· cited 44×
- Close v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 2011-08-03· cited 38×
- Rodriguez v. SmithNinth Circuit· 2008-09-04· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.