Skip to main content
· 1/7/2020

Daniel Rangel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that court “should employ [its] supervisory authority to create evidentiary prerequisites for circuit courts considering” whether stop occurred in high-crime area
  • rejecting argument that court should “employ [its] supervisory authority to create evidentiary prerequisites for circuit courts considering” whether stop occurred in high-crime area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.