Skip to main content
· 8/1/1994

Daniel R. Lujano v. Omaha Public Power District

Citations

  • 30 F.3d 1032
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1020
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19664
  • 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,266
  • 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 848
  • 1994 WL 393395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that good cause for failing to timely serve requires a showing of excusable neglect, which in turn requires good faith and a reasonable basis for noncompliance
  • finding good cause where magistrate judge failed to issue summons within 120 days and plaintiff was diligent in inquiring about status of his case
  • finding “good cause” where only a magistrate judge could issue a summons under a court’s local rules; plaintiff timely sought issuance of the summons; proceed until the [magistrate judge’s] initial review was completed.”
  • “Several courts of appeals have held that good cause requires at least excusable neglect.”
  • “The good cause standard requires more than excusable neglect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Wollman, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.