Daniel Paschedag v. Patricia L. Paschedag
Syllabus
This is an appeal from the trial court's designation of a child's primary residential parent. After an analysis of the best interest factors set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-106(a), the court concluded that it would be in the child's best interest to designate Mother as the child's primary residential parent. Father appealed. Mother has requested attorney's fees incurred in defending this appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, grant Mother's attorney's fees incurred on appeal, and remand to the trial court to determine the proper amount of Mother's award of attorney's fees.
Judges: Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 1,162×
- Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1996-03-11· cited 732×
- Archer v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-04-21· cited 249×
- In Re MarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-11-16· cited 234×
- Koch v. KochCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1993-10-15· cited 150×
- Parker v. ParkerTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-03-08· cited 116×
- Shofner v. ShofnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-01-11· cited 106×
- Katie J. Rountree v. Joshua RountreeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2012-02-01· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.