Daniel Otu v. Anita Whyte-Otu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant has a “right to a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial”
• stating that a defendant has a “right to a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial”
• determining that the trial court’s error in overruling defendant’s objection to the state offering facts not in evidence was not harmless, in part because the trial court denied defendant’s request for a curative instruction
• stating that OEC 103(3) applies to statements by lawyers
• reviewing for legal error and recognizing the “basic rule” that “the state may 378 State v. Alattar not suggest that the rules of evidence prevent it from pre- senting all its evidence to the jury”
• reviewing for legal error and recognizing the “basic rule” that “the state may 378 State v. Alattar not suggest that the rules of evidence prevent it from pre- senting all its evidence to the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).