Skip to main content
· 1/8/1962

Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. Whalen

Citations

  • 198 Cal. App. 2d 791
  • 18 Cal. Rptr. 659
  • 1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where a person is employed to design improvements to the product of his employer, or to design new products for his employer, and he does so, he may not use the results of such work for his own use and benefit, and particularly not to the detriment of his employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fourt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.