Daniel N. Mondrow v. Fountain House and Bernard I. Waters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that district courts have “jurisdiction to consider a timely Rule 59(e) motion ... as if no notice of appeal had been filed.”
• “unlike a timely notice of appeal, a premature notice of appeal does not divest the [trial] court of jurisdiction”
• non- appealable order or judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).