Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[because AEDPA has numerous effective date provisions, even within chapters, AEDPA’s structure has been important in divining intent”
• holding that general habeas statute allows review of statutory questions
• holding that general habeas statute allows review of statutory questions
• holding that general habeas statute allows review of statutory questions
• holding that general habeas statute allows review of statutory questions
• “That an alien charged with a crime . . . would factor the immigration consequences of conviction in deciding whether to plead or proceed to trial is well-documented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).