Daniel Lenn, Etc. v. Portland School Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, given totality of circumstances, an \infelicitous choice of phrase\ does not indicate that trial court deviated from \proper rule of decision\
• holding that, under the IDEA, “the benefit conferred [by the IEP] need not reach the highest attainable level or even the level needed to maximize the child’s potential.”
• holding that federal law does not require that “the benefit conferred [by the IEP] reach the highest attainable level or even the level needed to maximize the child’s potential.”
• holding that federal law does not require that “the benefit conferred [by the IEP] reach the highest attainable level or even the level needed to maximize the child’s potential.”
• holding that federal law does not require that \the benefit conferred [by the IEP] reach the highest attainable level or even the level needed to maximize the child's potential.\
• explaining that federal law requires school districts to provide a reasonable level of educational benefit to disabled children, not an optimal level

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).