Skip to main content
· 8/17/2016

Daniel Lee Reed v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a parent’s constitutional right to privacy in her mental health records shielded the records against discovery requests of grandparents seeking visitation
  • holding mother had “a statutory and constitutional right to privacy in her medical and mental health records”
  • concluding a parent’s constitutional right to privacy in her mental health records shielded the records against discovery requests of grandparents seeking -visitation
  • “reach[ing] no conclusion regarding the ability of a court to order disclosure of medical or mental health records to the State in a CINA action”
  • distinguishing between the review of discovery decisions and the review of interpretation of statutes
  • noting a qualified constitutional right to privacy in mental health .records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.