· 8/17/2016
Daniel Lee Reed v. State
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding a parent’s constitutional right to privacy in her mental health records shielded the records against discovery requests of grandparents seeking visitation
- holding mother had “a statutory and constitutional right to privacy in her medical and mental health records”
- concluding a parent’s constitutional right to privacy in her mental health records shielded the records against discovery requests of grandparents seeking -visitation
- “reach[ing] no conclusion regarding the ability of a court to order disclosure of medical or mental health records to the State in a CINA action”
- distinguishing between the review of discovery decisions and the review of interpretation of statutes
- noting a qualified constitutional right to privacy in mental health .records
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.