Daniel L. Sanders v. Leslie Ryder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting pro se petitions are held to a 3 “more lenient standard than counseled petitions”
• noting pro se petitions are held to a “more lenient standard than counseled 11 petitions”
• finding 9 exhaustion after construing pro se briefing liberally and concluding that the petitioner did not 10 raise “separate claims, but rather different aspects of a single claim”
• “Peterson 12 makes clear that, for the purposes of exhaustion, pro se petitions are held to a more lenient 13 standard than counseled petitions.”
• “Peterson makes clear that, for the purposes of exhaustion, pro se petitions are 13 held to a more lenient standard than counseled petitions.”
• separate 15 errors by counsel at trial and at sentencing “are … not separate claims, but rather different 16 aspects of a single claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).