Daniel K. Warren, Jr. v. Kenneth D. Kyler, the District Attorney of the County of Lehigh, the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that state court’s decision to apply presumption in the applicable version of 42 Pa. C.S. §9714 was not “an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established federal law”
• determining that state court’s decision to apply presumption in the applicable version of 42 Pa. C.S. § 9714 was not “an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established federal law”
• determining that state court’s decision to apply presumption in the applicable version of 42 Pa. C.S. § 9714 was not “an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).