· 1/8/1997
Daniel Joseph ALDERMAN, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
Citations
- 104 F.3d 285
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 214
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 327
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 242
- 1997 WL 4757
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no abuse of discretion when sanctions imposed fell within the Guidelines
- finding no abuse of discretion when sanctions imposed fell within the Guidelines
- affirming an agency’s credibility findings based on telephonic testimony
- affirming an agency’s credibility findings based on telephonic testimony
- affirming an agency’s credibility findings based on telephonic testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canby, Rymer, Kleinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.