Skip to main content
· 1/8/1997

Daniel Joseph ALDERMAN, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent

Citations

  • 104 F.3d 285
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 214
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 327
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 242
  • 1997 WL 4757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion when sanctions imposed fell within the Guidelines
  • finding no abuse of discretion when sanctions imposed fell within the Guidelines
  • affirming an agency’s credibility findings based on telephonic testimony
  • affirming an agency’s credibility findings based on telephonic testimony
  • affirming an agency’s credibility findings based on telephonic testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Rymer, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.