Skip to main content
· 3/19/1985

Daniel J. Wells v. Federal Aviation Administration

Citations

  • 755 F.2d 804
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Civil Service Reform Act’s remedies precluded a plaintiff’s due process claim brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 389 (1971)
  • Because no regulation required on-duty status pay, “no unjustified or unwarranted personnel action occurred.”
  • Because no regulation required on-duty status pay, \no unjustified or unwarranted personnel action occurred.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Hatchett, Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.