Daniel J. Waletzki v. P.W. Keohane, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that habeas corpus was correct remedy for miscalculation of sentence
• noting that § 2241 is the proper avenue where the prisoner is “attacking the fact or length of his confinement in federal prison on the basis of something that happened after he was convicted and sentenced”
• prisoner challenging federal conviction and sentence should proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
• claim regarding arbitrary denial of good‐time credits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).