Daniel J. Murray v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that separate knee evaluations may be warranted where \the appellant's symptoms are distinct and separate\ (internal quotation omitted)
• discussing statute and regulation prohibiting changes in protected ratings, i.e., those in effect for more than 10 or 20 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).