Daniel J. Hartwig Associates, Inc. v. Allan Kanner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant purposefully availed itself of the benefits of conducting business in Wisconsin when it solicited the services of a forum plaintiff
• stating that “[m]atters of trial management are for the district judge” and that the court of appeals “will intervene only when it is apparent that the judge has acted unreasonably”
• listing “illness of counsel on the eve of trial” as a circumstance that may justify a continuance
• finding, “[w]hile not dispositive to our conclusion, there are other relevant factors that weigh in favor of finding purposeful availment in this case” including the attorney’s connections and business dealings with other residents in the state
• “While a single contract between a seller and a nonresident buyer, without something more (such as active solicitation
• personal jurisdiction comported with due process because the defendant solicited the plaintiffs Illinois business numerous times and created a continuing relationship between himself and a resident of Illinois

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).