Daniel International Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the case was a contract dispute with issues of the sort usually tried to a jury
• “However, the only pleading on which a demand was endorsed merely added a party to its counterclaim. […] It did not plead any new issues.”
• although “a contract dispute” involved “extensive documentation,” its “operative issues were well within the comprehension of a jury”
• contract dispute the sort of action usually tried by a jury
• on the facts presented, a four month delay did not counsel against honoring an untimely jury trial request where the matter had in fact been set for jury trial and the adverse party belatedly sought to strike the setting of the matter for a jury trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).