Daniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that gang affiliation evidence should have been excluded where the prosecution did not also present evidence connecting the defendant's gang membership to the crime
• concluding that trial court improperly admitted ER 404(b) gang affiliation evidence because the State failed to connect the evidence
• evidence of gang membership is not relevant unless evidence shows a nexus between the crime and gang membership
• reversing when evidence at trial failed to establish nexus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).