Daniel G. Padillas v. Stork-Gamco, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in limine hearings are encouraged when courts are concerned with the factual, rather than legal, dimensions of the evidence
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in excluding an expert's opinion without conducting an in limine hearing focused on the Daubert reliability of his testimony
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in excluding an expert's opinion without conducting an in limine hearing focused on the Daubert reliability of his testimony
• stating that a district court may abuse its discretion in failing to conduct a Daubert hearing “when the ruling on admissibility turns on factual issues”
• stating that a district court may abuse its 23 discretion in failing to conduct a Daubert hearing \when the ruling on admissibility turns on factual issues\
• hearing necessary where court is concerned with the “factual dimensions” of the proposed expert’s evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).