Daniel G. Hamm v. Tomeka Scott James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that EITC was exempt under Alabama exemption for “public assistance for needy persons”
• defining “administrative” as “of or relating to administration,” “administration” as “the act or process of administering,” and “administering” as “managing”
• “Because the EITC was enacted to provide relief for low- income families, we conclude that it qualifies as government aid to needy persons.”
• finding EITC exempt under Alabama law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).