Daniel Freund v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that evidence of gas leaks in certain RV models not subject to the litigation was irrelevant to likelihood of gas leaks in the RV in question and therefore keeping these statements from the jury was within the trial justice's discretion
• finding retrospective application of 1993 amended Rule 11 “neither just nor practicable”
• declining to apply amended Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c) which would work \manifest injustice\
• “[A] continuance midway through the trial could have meant losing the benefits of previously cross-examined witnesses____”
• \[A] continuance midway <br>through the trial could have meant losing the benefits of <br>previously cross-examined witnesses . . . .\
• where plaintiff waited until the eve of trial to inform defendant of the substance of expert’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).