Daniel F. Daigle v. Point Landing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a failure to warn does not constitute a breach in the duty of care “unless the resultant harm is reasonably foreseeable”
• stating that a failure to warn does not constitute a breach in the duty of care “unless the resultant harm is reasonably foreseeable”
• stating that a failure to warn does not constitute a breach in the duty of care “unless the resultant harm is reasonably foreseeable”
• “[M]aritime law recognizes both strict product liability causes of action (i.e., defective warning or defective design
• “Liability for failure to warn thus arises from foreseeability, or the knowledge that particular conduct will create danger.”
• “Liability for a failure to warn thus arises from foreseeability, or the knowledge that particular conduct will create danger.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).