Daniel Esquivel v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to decide whether the FHA permits disparate impact claims as to grant administration, but assuming that it does
• noting that a substantial likelihood of success the merits is often dispositive
• noting that a substantial likelihood of success the merits is often dispositive
• explaining, in the context of a preliminary injunction, that a “plaintiff must generally ‘demonstrate with statistical evidence that the practice or policy has an adverse effect on the protected group’” (quoting Garcia v. Johanns, 444 F.3d 625, 633 (D.C. Cir. 2006)
• “When a plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits, there is no need to consider the remaining factors.”
• “[w]hen a plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits, there is no need to consider the remaining factors” for a preliminary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).