Daniel D. Flood v. Young Woman's Christian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “there is no indication Georgia law requires specific language as to each risk assumed during” activities covered by exculpatory clauses
• concluding a sua sponte grant of summary judgment was appropriate where the plaintiff failed to present new 15 evidence in post-summary judgment filings
• upholding a fitness club’s liability release as valid under Georgia public policy and examining Georgia appellate cases regarding similar releases
• explaining that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on an issue raised sua sponte because the nonmovant addressed the issue in their reply brief and both parties were on notice that they must present all of their evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).