Daniel Cook v. Charles Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial judge was “ideally situated” to make an assessment of the facts when resolving post-conviction issues
• noting that the trial judge was “ideally situated” to make an assessment of the facts when resolving post-conviction issues
• noting that the trial judge was “ideally situated” to make an assessment of the facts when resolving post-conviction issues
• observing that Martinez used Miller-El as “generally analogous sup- port”
• finding no prejudice where “the same trial judge who sentenced” the petitioner to death stated that the new evidence “would not have made any difference”
• observing that Martinez used Miller-El as “generally analogous support”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).