Daniel Bullard v. Shannon Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Oklahoma’s determina- tion that mental retardation is a static condition is neither con- trary to, nor an unreasonable application of, Atkins
• “Because there are no additional constitutional errors to aggregate, Ochoa’s cumulative error claim necessarily fails.”
• “The liberty interest at issue in this case, the right of the mentally retarded to avoid execution, flows directly from the Eighth Amendment.”
• “[W]hen a state court admits evidence that is ‘so unduly prejudicial that it renders the trial fundamentally unfair, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a mechanism for relief.’” (quoting Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 825 (1991))
• “[W]hen a state court admits evidence that is ‘so unduly prejudicial that it renders the trial fundamentally unfair, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a mechanism for relief.’” (quoting Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 825 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).