Daniel Athey v. Farmers Insurance Exchangeillinois Farmers Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to bifurcate claims because the - movant did not show prejudice
• finding no abuse of discretion where district court denied motion to bifurcate because requesting party failed to show prejudice
• affirming district court’s refusal to bifurcate claims because insurer had failed to show prejudice
• because the movant could not show prejudice, the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to bifurcate claims
• the key issue for determining whether or not to bifurcate proceedings is whether a party will be prejudiced absent bifurcation
• because the movant could not show prejudice, the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to bifurcate claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).