DANIEL ARROYO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “trial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims to which his client has neglected to supply the essential underlying facts . . . ; clairvoyance is not required of effective trial counsel”
• “A trial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims as to which his client has neglected to supply the essential underlying facts when those facts are within the client’s possession; clairvoyance is not required of effective trial counsel”
• “clairvoyance is not required of effective trial counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).