Skip to main content
· 11/29/1996

Daniel A. George v. Local Union No. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Afl-Cio

Citations

  • 100 F.3d 1008
  • 321 U.S. App. D.C. 394
  • 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2900
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s application of “the six-month statute of limitations of section 10(b) to . . . duty of fair representation claims”
  • affirming application of six-month limitations period to duty of fair representation claims
  • union did not violate duty of fair representation by not permitting member from serving on negotiating committee or attending negotiating meetings
  • six- month statute of limitations applies to suits where only the union is sued
  • six-month statute of limitations applies to suits where only the union is sued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Wald, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.