· 5/17/2004
D'Angelo v. Potter
Citations
- 221 F.R.D. 289
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8847
- 2004 WL 1089470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting counsel’s acknowledgment at oral argument that “nothing in the joint proposed order ... in any way precludes or impacts any future litigation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.