D'Angelo Pugh v. Julie L. Jones, Sec., FL Dept. of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a slight overbreadth in the age of victims protected by a state statute 6 No. 24-2375 as compared with federal law did not mean the two were un- related
• reading language expansively in categorical comparison of state and federal sex crimes
• \We therefore cannot accept [the] argument that Congress must have intended to import into § 2252(b)(2) the specific provisions of Chapter 109A.\
• “Mr. Kraemer’s Wisconsin conviction for first-degree sexual assault is one ‘relating to’ abusive sexual conduct in- volving a minor despite a slight difference in the maximum age of the victim under state and federal law.”
• explaining the differences in detail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).