Daney v. Department of Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that actions by a prison official that are “merely negligent [are] insufficient to support . . . a denial of access to the courts . . . claim under § 1983”
• affirming dismissal of retaliation claim because incarcerated person conceded that defendant’s “actions were merely ‘negligent,’ and that is insufficient to support . . . [a] retaliation claim under § 1983”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).