Danelle M. Frantz, n/k/a Danelle M. Shipp v. David B. Frantz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant charged with a supervised release violation may be “release[d] or detain[ed] . . . under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) . . . pending further proceedings”
• explaining that a probation officer can enforce the conditions of supervised release
• stating that plain-error review applies where a defendant does not object in the district court, and that to obtain relief on plain-error review, the “defendant must show that the district court committed an error that was plain and that affected his substantial rights”
• stating that plain-error review applies where a defendant does not object in the district court, and that to obtain relief on plain-error review, the “defendant must show that the district court committed an error that was plain and that affected his substantial rights”
• standard of review; before entering judgment on guilty plea, district court must determine there is adequate factual basis for plea
• “Before a district court enters judgment on a defendant’s guilty plea, it must determine that there is an adequate factual basis for the plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).