· 4/28/1981
Dandashi v. Fine
Citations
- 397 So. 2d 442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- it is only in the absence of any evidence that a court should direct a verdict for a defendant
- no authority in Florida for exclusion of testimony of expert witness where expert, without knowledge of counsel, discusses case with opposing party, who is also an expert
- directed verdict for defendant improper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Nesbitt and Ferguson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.