Skip to main content
· 4/28/1981

Dandashi v. Fine

Citations

  • 397 So. 2d 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it is only in the absence of any evidence that a court should direct a verdict for a defendant
  • no authority in Florida for exclusion of testimony of expert witness where expert, without knowledge of counsel, discusses case with opposing party, who is also an expert
  • directed verdict for defendant improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Nesbitt and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.