Skip to main content
· 8/31/2023

Dana Michele Struve v. Frank Andrew Struve

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police could not force \suspects\ to give fingerprints to aid in a criminal investigation absent probable cause
  • holding that fingerprint evidence obtained in the absence of probable cause to arrest must be suppressed
  • holding that fingerprint evidence obtained in the absence of probable cause to arrest must be suppressed
  • holding that the Fourth Amendment applies during the investigative, as well as accusatory, stage
  • holding that the Fourth Amendment applies during the investigative, as well as accusatory, stage
  • holding that fingerprint evidence obtained in the absence of probable cause to arrest must be suppressed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.