· 8/31/2023
Dana Michele Struve v. Frank Andrew Struve
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that police could not force \suspects\ to give fingerprints to aid in a criminal investigation absent probable cause
- holding that fingerprint evidence obtained in the absence of probable cause to arrest must be suppressed
- holding that fingerprint evidence obtained in the absence of probable cause to arrest must be suppressed
- holding that the Fourth Amendment applies during the investigative, as well as accusatory, stage
- holding that the Fourth Amendment applies during the investigative, as well as accusatory, stage
- holding that fingerprint evidence obtained in the absence of probable cause to arrest must be suppressed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.