Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 11/22/2013

Dana Ltd. v. Aon Consulting, Inc.

Citations

  • 984 F. Supp. 2d 755
  • 2013 WL 6154397
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff’s “efforts to dress up its breach-of-contract claim in language sounding in negligence is insufficient to identify a duty independent of the contract”
  • finding that plaintiff’s argument that defendant owed a separate duty to defendant “ignores the fact that [defendant] would owe [plaintiff] no duties whatsoever but for the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.