Dana Kaskel v. Northern Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a district court’s decision not to transfer a case under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) because it lacked personal jurisdiction
• reversing a district court’s decision not to transfer a case under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) because it lacked personal jurisdiction
• “If the other party to your contract breaks it, and instead of walking away from it you act as if it remains in force, it does remain in force. You cannot later repudiate it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).