Damschroeder v. Williams (In Re Williams)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nowhere in § 523(a)(15) is it provided that a marital debt [to a former spouse] cannot be ‘incurred’ for purposes of the statute simply because the underlying debt is owed to a third party.”
• \Nowhere in § 523(a)(15) is it provided that a marital debt cannot be `incurred' [in the course of a divorce or separation] for purposes of the statute simply because the underlying debt is owed to a third party.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).