Skip to main content
· 5/13/1924

Damron v. Sowards

Citations

  • 203 Ky. 211
  • 261 S.W. 1093
  • 1924 Ky. LEXIS 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Kendall “firmly rejected [the] argument that defendants’ violation of their statutory duties under ERISA is in and of itself an injury in fact to [the plaintiff]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.