Skip to main content
· 4/5/1963

Dampman v. M. & CC OF BALTIMORE

Citations

  • 189 A.2d 631
  • 231 Md. 280
  • 1963 Md. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In Baltimore City there appears to be no distinction between the two terms.... ”
  • “It thus appears that this case presents substantially no conflict as to fact but merely a question of law involving the construction of the zoning ordinance with reference to special exceptions.”
  • “It thus appears that this case presents substantially no conflict as to fact but merely a question of law involving the construction of the zoning ordinance with reference to special exceptions.”
  • “It thus appears that this case presents substantially no conflict as to fact but merely a question of law involving the construction of the zoning ordinance with reference to special exceptions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brune, Hammond, Prescott, Marbury, Sybert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.