Skip to main content
· 8/16/2016

Damonte Bonds v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to effect service within the prescribed time period constitutes neglect
  • noting implementation of new office procedures to ensure missed deadlines do not recur is a mitigating factor
  • imposing a sixty-day suspension on attorney who had a history of sanctions for failing to cooperate with the Board and not communicating with clients, and who had again neglected client matters and failed to communicate with clients
  • noting attorney’s admission of responsibility is a mitigating factor
  • finding violations of rules 32:1.3, 32:1.4, and 32:8.4(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.