· 8/16/2016
Damonte Bonds v. State
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to effect service within the prescribed time period constitutes neglect
- noting implementation of new office procedures to ensure missed deadlines do not recur is a mitigating factor
- imposing a sixty-day suspension on attorney who had a history of sanctions for failing to cooperate with the Board and not communicating with clients, and who had again neglected client matters and failed to communicate with clients
- noting attorney’s admission of responsibility is a mitigating factor
- finding violations of rules 32:1.3, 32:1.4, and 32:8.4(d)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.