· 8/9/2023
Damon Wildcat v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- warning that assumption of risk “must not, contrary to the will of Congress, be allowed recrudescence under any other label in the common law lexicon”
- stating that assumption of risk first developed in the United States to protect employers
- holding that “the employer’s liability is to be determined under the general rule which defines negligence as the lack of due care under the circumstances; or the failure to do what a reasonable and prudent man would ordinarily have done under the circumstances of the situation”
- holding that “the employer’s liability is to be determined under the general rule which defines negligence as the lack of due care under the circumstances; or the failure to do what a reasonable and prudent man would ordinarily have done under the circumstances of the situation”
- noting the Senate Judiciary Committee's belief that the doctrine of assumption of risk was unsuited for contemporaneous economic activities
- noting the Senate Judiciary Committee’s belief that the doctrine of assumption of risk was unsuited for contemporaneous economic activities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.