Damn I'm Good, Inc. v. Sakowitz, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “stating that the doctrine of aesthetic functionality has no applicability in situations where a potential buyer is motivated by the aesthetic features of the design rather than the source of the product”
• where plaintiff used DAMN I’M GOOD as a message engraved on a bracelet and commenced use of the term on a hangtag only after competitors began to produce similar products, court held that “plaintiff does not hold a valid trademark.”
• where plaintiff used DAMN I’M GOOD as a message engraved on a bracelet and commenced use of the term on a hangtag only after competitors began to produce similar products, court held that “plaintiff does not hold a valid trademark.”
• where plaintiff used DAMN I’M GOOD as a message engraved on a bracelet and commenced use of the term on a hangtag only after competitors began to produce similar products, court held that “plaintiff does not hold a valid trademark.”
• where plaintiff used DAMN I’M GOOD as a message engraved on a bracelet and commenced use of the term on a hangtag only after competitors began to produce similar products, court held that “plaintiff does not hold a valid trademark.”
• where plaintiff used DAMN I’M GOOD as a message engraved on a bracelet and commenced use of the term on a hangtag only after competitors began to produce similar products, court held that “plaintiff does not hold a valid trademark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).