Damm v. U-Save Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ORCP 23C’s second requirement, i.e., notice, applies only to misidentified defendants, not misnamed defendants
• explaining the differences between a dece- dent and the personal representative of a decedent’s estate
• substituting the personal representative for the deceased defendant changed the party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).