Skip to main content
· 4/16/2007

Damien Giles, a Minor, by Denise Giles, His Mother and Natural Guardian v. Michael J. Astrue

Citations

  • 483 F.3d 483
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8617
  • 2007 WL 1112587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding because ALJ’s decision was apparently inconsistent with testimony; emphasizing that the ALJ must either explain basis for finding witness not credible or explain why testimony is consistent with finding
  • “If ... [claimant’s] testimony was credible, the ALJ was required to explain why the testimony did not support a finding that [the child] was markedly limited in attending and completing tasks.”
  • “We require an explanation of why strong evidence favorable to the plaintiff is overcome by the evidence on which an ALJ relies.”
  • “We require an explanation of why strong evidence favorable to the plaintiff is overcome by the evidence on which an ALJ relies.”
  • “We require an explanation of why strong evidence favorable to the plaintiff is overcome by the evidence on which an ALJ relies.”
  • “We require an explanation of why strong evidence favorable to the plaintiff is overcome by the evidence on which an ALJ relies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Kanne, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.