Skip to main content
· 7/8/2011

D'Amico v. Tweeter Opco, LLC (In Re Tweeter Opco, LLC)

Citations

  • 453 B.R. 534
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2526
  • 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 41
  • 2011 WL 2680838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employer must “(i) give as much notice as is practicable and (ii) set forth specific facts in the notice that explain the reason for reducing the notice period” in order to invoke the exceptions
  • stating that Schultze, owner and managing director of SAM, ordered a SAM employee to terminate the debtor’s employees on multiple occasions
  • finding common ownership where a corporation “arranged for [others] to pay off Wells Fargo, the former senior lender, and become ‘first in line as lender’”
  • disagreeing with Guippone v. BH S&B Holdings and expanding common ownership to indirect equity holders
  • “There is no evidence that SAM and the Debtor actually functioned as a single entity with respect to personnel policies on a regular, day-today basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary F. Walrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.